Yellow Report Detector PID
Greetings!
This page has been set up to access and document progress within the Particle Identification (PID) Detector Working Group (DWG) convened to study PID technology leading up to the EIC Yellow Report.
PID DWG Meetings (indico)
- January 22: Software Tools for PID
- February 10: Common Meeting with eRD14
- February 25: Preparation for Temple
- April 1: BiWeekly Meeting
- April 15: BiWeekly Meeting
- May 1: BiWeekly Meeting
- May 8: BiWeekly Meeting
- May 15: BiWeekly Meeting
- June 5: BiWeekly Meeting
- June 19: BiWeekly Meeting
- July 3: BiWeekly Meeting
- July 31: BiWeekly Meeting
- July 31: BiWeekly Meeting
- August 21: BiWeekly Meeting
PID Basics
It is assumed that a magnetic spectrometer and a calorimeter system will provide measurements of charged particle momentum and electromagnetic shower energy. This is typically insufficient to identify the species of the particle measured, except for cases such as topological reconstruction such as neutral-V decays (e.g. Λ decay) or displaced vertex (e.g. charm or bottom quark decays). PID systems primarily use some form of velocity determination to distinguish species: electron, pion, Kaon, and proton. Nature supplies several options for velocity or velocity-dependent interactions of particle:
- Time of Flight (TOF).
- A direct measurement of velocity combining path length as delivered by the tracking system with a start and stop time.
- The principle performance-driving factor for any TOF system is the timing resolution.
- The highest timing resolution options are sensitive to magnetic field and must be oriented carefully.
- Cherenkov Effect
- The Chernkov effect results from a polarization of a radiating medium induced by the passage of a charged particle.
- The production angle for cherenkov photons goes as .
- Threshold cherenkov counters are typically used for electron ID and fire when .
- Imaging detectors measure via focusing optics and ID all species electron, pion, Kaon, proton.
- The principle performance-driving factor of a cherenkov-based system is the index of refraction.
- The cherenkov photon generation goes as , forcing low index radiators to be long.
- Specific Ionization (aka dE/dx)
- Rate of ionization is, for some ranges of momentum a strong function of momentum as shown below:
- The steepest dependence of ionization rate on velocity is in the Bethe-Bloch regime.
- Landau fluctuations complicate the measurement and are typically battled using many samples over a long track length.
- Transition Radiation
- Charged particles crossing a step function in refractive index have possibility to release a photon.
- These photons can be identified by relatively large energy (typically x-ray regime) and being non-colinear with the track.
- Typically high-Z additives to gas detectors (e.g. Xenon) are used to improve x-ray detection efficiency.
- High pixelation (as provided by silicon detectors) is typically required to ID off-axis TR photons.
Detector Technology Evaluation Strategy
The selection of detector technologies for PID will be principally driven by the momentum spectrum of produced particles. The momentum spectrum is drive by a number of factors:
- Collision kinematics (electron energy, hadron energy)
- Direction of ejectile (either captured as or
- Underlying production mechanism.
Example of Physics Production: Charmed Hadron Decays
Simulating the ejectile spectra is the task of the so-called Physics Working Groups (PWG) and is communicated by them to all detector working groups. Shown here is an example of the output for the production of charm hadrons and their subsequent decay products as a function of momentum and .
The striking feature in this process is the asymmetry in requirements with the highest momentum hadrons produced in the forward eta.
Standardized Simulation Format from PWG
The PWG convenors have defined a Standard Histogram to Display Kinematics Coverage examples of which are shown here as scavenged from the PWG presentation at the Pavia Workshop:
Plots such as those above are currently evolving from the PWG efforts. The eventual goal is to overlay the detector technology performance with the physics requirements as shown in cartoon fashion below:
Status of Input from PWG
At the date of this writing (June 15, 2020), the data files are not yet available from the PWG to be used in making the detector requirements plots. Olga reports that they are working hard but have not yet achieved this milestone. We shall instead merely glean comments from the summary slides of Pavia where we can. These comments are summarized in the table below:
PWG | Conveners | Comments |
---|---|---|
Inclusive Reactions |
|
Charged Current (CC) x-sec:
|
SIDIS |
|
Studying requirements for
|
Jets and Heavy Quarks |
|
Requirements/Assumptions
Additional Remarks:
|
Diffraction & Tagging |
|
Processes needing PID
|
Status Table
p-Range @ Radiator L |
Contributes to | Parameterized | Pro/con | External Constraints | Simulation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
psec TOF LGAD TOF |
Up to 10 GeV/c Depends on and L |
N/A | YES | YES | YES | YES (CMS) |
dual RICH (dRICH) (aerogel, gas) |
2-60 GeV/c @ 1.6 meter |
YES
|
YES | YES | YES
|
YES
|
GEM RICH (Gas Electron Multiplier) |
20 - 50 GeV/c @ 1 meter |
YES
|
YES | YES | YES | YES (ePHENIX) |
modular RICH (mRICH) | 2-10 GeV/c @ 3.0 cm |
YES
|
~YES | YES | YES (tracking) |
YES
|
Detection of Internally Reflected Cherenkov (DIRC) |
0.8 - 6 GeV/c @ 1.7 cm |
YES
|
YES | YES | YES | YES
|
(TPC) |
0.5-3 GeV/c @ 60 cm |
N/A | ~YES (Parameterized Test Beam) |
NO | N/A | YES
|
Transition Radiation Detector (TRD) |
eID only p>1 GeV/c |
N/A | NO | NO | N/A | YES
|
Hadron Blind Detector (HBD) |
eID only 0.1-4 GeV/c @ 50 cm |
N/A | YES (Measured PHENIX HBD) |
NO | N/A | YES
|
Feedback to Complementarity Group
The PID group was asked in August 2020 to provide feedback on a list of questions. The questions and an exposition to clarify the meaning of each question is posted here. Detector complementarity is defined independently in each of three regions: Electron Arm, Central Arm, Hadron Arm, each of which is discussed in detail below.
Arm | Electrons | Package 1 | Package 2 | Package 3 | Package 4 | Package 5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resolution | PID | p-Range | Separation | ||||||
Electron | 2-7% / √ E | rejection 10^4 | ≤ 7 GeV/c | > 3-sigma | HBD | mRICH | TRD | LAPPD | LGAD |
Central | 10-12% / √ E | rejection 10^4 | ≤ 5 GeV/c | > 3-sigma | DIRC | dE/dx | LGAD | ||
Hadron | 10-12% / √ E | ≤ 45 GeV/c | > 3-sigma | dRICH | mRICH | LAPPD | LGAD |
Feedback to Integration Group
The PID group was asked in August 2020 to provide feedback on a list of questions. The questions and an exposition to clarify the meaning of each question is posted here. Detector integration is defined independently in each of three regions: Electron Arm, Central Arm, Hadron Arm, each of which is discussed in detail below.
Arm | Electrons | Package 1 | Package 2 | Package 3 | Package 4 | Package 5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resolution | PID | p-Range | Separation | ||||||
Electron | 2-7% / √ E | rejection 10^4 | ≤ 7 GeV/c | > 3-sigma | HBD | mRICH | TRD | LAPPD | LGAD |
Central | 10-12% / √ E | rejection 10^4 | ≤ 5 GeV/c | > 3-sigma | DIRC | dE/dx | LGAD | ||
Hadron | 10-12% / √ E | ≤ 45 GeV/c | > 3-sigma | dRICH | mRICH | LAPPD | LGAD |
Detector Technology Matrix
Here the co-conveners are confused. We thought that we were to edit & update the detector matrix presented at Pavia:
Since we don't have access to that detector matrix, we made our own inside this wiki:
Nomenclature | Electrons | Technology | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resolution | PID | p-Range | Separation | |||
-3.5 --> -1.0 | Backward Detector | 2-7% / √ E | rejection 10^4 | ≤ 7 GeV/c | > 3-sigma | HBD mRICH TRD LAPPD LGAD |
-1.0 --> 1.0 | Central Detector | 10-12% / √ E | rejection 10^4 | ≤ 5 GeV/c | > 3-sigma | DIRC dE/dx LGAD |
1.0 --> 2.0 | Forward Detector-1 | 10-12% / √ E | ≤ 8 GeV/c | > 3-sigma | dRICH mRICH LAPPD LGAD |
|
2.0 --> 3.0 | Forward Detector-1 | 10-12% / √ E | ≤ 20 GeV/c | > 3-sigma | dRICH Gas RICH TRD |
|
3.0 --> 3.5 | Forward Detector-1 | 10-12% / √ E | ≤ 45 GeV/c | > 3-sigma | dRICH Gas RICH TRD |
Electron Arm Detector Technology Options
In the electron arm, the principle goal is the separation of electrons (most often the primary scattered electron) from pion or heavier hadron interference. Several options exist are and listed here:
- Hadron-Blind Detector (HBD)
- The HBD developed and operated in the PHENIX experiment at BNL produced 20 photo-electrons on 50 cm of gas.
- The HBD Threshold for pions was well matched to the requirements.
- Shorter radiator lengths than 50 cm are possible but require further study.
- mRICH
- A modular RICH uses a proximity-focused aerogel radiator focussed with a fresnel lens.
- The fresnel lens not only focuses the ring, but it also filters low wavelength scattered light.
- TRD
- The transition radiation detector assists pion rejection at the 5X level and can assist lower momentum technologies.
- LAPPD
- LAPPD is the current best time resolution device known,
- LAPPD uses micro-channel plate amplification of cherenkov light created in a quartz window.
- Current best performance is ! 5psec.
Central Arm Detector Technology Options
The central arm barrel is challenging because of space requirements. PID must be accomplished in a very short detector space, unless the PID is coupled with another detector purpose.
- dE/dx
- The specific ionization of a particle depends upon velocity.
- Some tracking technologies (e.g. TPC) provide dE/dx measurements to aid in PID in the central arm.
- DIRC
- The DIRC focuses cherenkov light released and internally reflected in a precision quartz bar.
- The light is channeled away from the central region for detection.
- R&D has advanced the DIRC technology to each well beyond the initial implementation in BaBar.
- LGAD
- LGAD is the not current best time resolution device known, however it is able to work in a magnetic field.
- LGAD is a silicon-pixel based technology and provives precision tracking at the same time as TOF.
- Current best performance is ~ 20 psec.
Hadron Arm Detector Technology Options
In the hadron arm, we are required to reach the highest possible momenta. Gas cherenkov technology is the only one suited to reach the highest momentum goals, however due to the cherekov threshold, gas cherenkov must be assisted by another technology at the lower momenta
- Dual RICH (dRICH)
- A dual RICH configuration images both a higher index (aerogel) radiator and a lower index radiator (gas) onto the same focal plane.
- This configuration allows the device to span a very wide range in momenta.
- mRICH
- A modular RICH uses a proximity-focused aerogel radiator focussed with a fresnel lens.
- The fresnel lens not only focuses the ring, but it also filters low wavelength scattered light.
- It would require gas cherenkov in addition.
- LAPPD
- LAPPD is the current best time resolution device known,
- LAPPD uses micro-channel plate amplification of cherenkov light created in a quartz window.
- Current best performance is ! 5psec.
- This would need to be assisted by gas cherenkov to reach the highest momentum.
- TRD
- The transition radiation detector assists pion rejection at the 5X level and can assist lower momentum technologies.
- This is used to assist electron ID for decay electrons (e.g. vector meson decay).
- LGAD
- LGAD is the not current best time resolution device known, however it is able to work in a magnetic field.
- LGAD is a silicon-pixel based technology and provives precision tracking at the same time as TOF.
- Current best performance is ~ 20 psec.
Yellow Report Chapter
The Yellow Report Chapter on PID will be developed collaboratively using the overleaf tool. The draft document is found | here.